Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
How Shenandoah Telecommunications Company stacks up
SHEN · against 147 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #112 of 148 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score26 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including SHEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 86% of peers. Operating margin: -5.3% vs peer median 8.2%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on assets: -1.9% vs peer median 2.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 78% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.0% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SHEN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SHEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 139 reported | -1.0% | 3.6% | 28% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 147 reported | -5.3% | 5.3% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 144 reported | -1.9% | 1.5% | 27% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 137 reported | -3.9% | 2.7% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 149 reported | 64.9% | 39.5% | 80% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SHEN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67.5B INR (≈$811M) | 100 | 35 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 6.3B SEK (≈$635M) | 97 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2.5B HKD (≈$316M) | 96 | 70 | |
| 4 | 47.1B JPY (≈$320M) | 96 | 85 | |
| 109 | 3.1B SEK (≈$311M) | 17 | 31 | |
| 112 | 3.7B CNY (≈$514M) | 16 | 18 | |
| 112 | 5.3B CNY (≈$742M) | 16 | 19 | |
| 112 | 1.1B AUD (≈$743M) | 16 | 39 | |
| 112 | 554M USD | 16 | 33 | |
| 116 | 7.8B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 15 | 31 | |
| 116 | 324M USD | 15 | 25 | |
| 118 | 3.8B CNY (≈$535M) | 14 | 26 | |
| 118 | 7.8B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 14 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score