Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sigma Lithium Corporation
How Sigma Lithium Corporation stacks up
SGML · against 545 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #310 of 546 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including SGML · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -4.3% vs peer median 3.6%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SGML, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SGML | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 526 reported | -4.3% | 2.4% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 557 reported | 4.7% | 7.4% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | 4.7% | 0.6% | 66% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 524 reported | 13.3% | 68.6% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SGMLScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score