Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sigma Lithium Corporation
How Sigma Lithium Corporation stacks up
SGML · against 204 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
27/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #136 of 205 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score11 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including SGML · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 93% of peers. Operating margin: -11.1% vs peer median 7.6%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 8.1% vs peer median 6.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 65% of peers. Return on assets: 4.1% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SGML, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SGML | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 198 reported | 8.1% | 8.0% | 50% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 192 reported | -11.1% | 11.2% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 223 reported | 4.1% | 2.7% | 60% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 213 reported | -31.6% | 7.1% | 11% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 226 reported | 49.1% | 29.7% | 76% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SGML| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44.8B USD | 98 | 88 | |
| 1 | 17.9B USD | 98 | 88 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 98 | 88 | |
| 1 | 33.7B USD | 98 | 82 | |
| 1 | 685M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 132 | 7.1B USD | 34 | 49 | |
| 133 | 11.6B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score