Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sight Sciences, Inc.
How Sight Sciences, Inc. stacks up
SGHT · against 465 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
8/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #301 of 466 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including SGHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 8?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -5.6% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -5.7% vs peer median 1.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.5% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SGHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SGHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 453 reported | -5.8% | 0.5% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 471 reported | -4.0% | 3.5% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 202 reported | -4.5% | -6.7% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 462 reported | 10.3% | 48.0% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SGHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.50T IDR (≈$403M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 301 | 504M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 301 | 388M USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 301 | 730M USD | 8 | 11 | |
| 301 | 468M USD | 8 | 40 | |
| 301 | 519M USD | 8 | 22 | |
| 301 | 673M USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 301 | 588M USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 301 | 303M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 301 | 354M USD | 8 | 13 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score