Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sight Sciences, Inc.
How Sight Sciences, Inc. stacks up
SGHT · against 463 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #385 of 464 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score47 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including SGHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: -91.6% vs peer median 4.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 85% of peers. Return on assets: -28.4% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 81% of peers. Operating margin: -33.4% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SGHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SGHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 437 reported | -91.6% | 2.0% | 7% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 434 reported | -33.4% | 4.9% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 460 reported | -28.4% | 0.9% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 440 reported | -48.4% | 1.2% | 15% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 480 reported | 88.0% | 40.0% | 93% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SGHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 914M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 385 | 593M USD | 17 | 40 | |
| 385 | 479M USD | 17 | 34 | |
| 385 | 393M USD | 17 | 50 | |
| 385 | 276M USD | 17 | 46 | |
| 385 | 519M USD | 17 | 22 | |
| 392 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 16 | 51 | |
| 392 | 302M USD | 16 | 17 | |
| 392 | 650M USD | 16 | 48 | |
| 392 | 643M USD | 16 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score