Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sweetgreen, Inc.
How Sweetgreen, Inc. stacks up
SG · against 482 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #445 of 483 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including SG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -3.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 478 reported | 0.8% | 4.8% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 492 reported | -3.8% | 9.2% | 3% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | -9.1% | 6.8% | 8% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 479 reported | 34.4% | 55.9% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 151.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 6.9B HKD (≈$885M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 445 | 13.3B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 10 | 19 | |
| 445 | 680M USD | 10 | 21 | |
| 445 | 2.3B USD | 10 | 16 | |
| 445 | 1.0B GBP (≈$1.3B) | 10 | 21 | |
| 445 | 1.4B USD | 10 | 28 | |
| 450 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 9 | 35 | |
| 450 | 8.6B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 9 | 33 | |
| 450 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 9 | 17 | |
| 450 | 13.9B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 9 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score