Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SFL Corporation Ltd.
How SFL Corporation Ltd. stacks up
SFL · against 717 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #243 of 718 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score78 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SFL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.3% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SFL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SFL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 718 reported | 1.9% | 4.5% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 726 reported | 10.7% | 7.8% | 69% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 188 reported | 12.7% | 4.6% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 720 reported | 60.6% | 52.5% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SFL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 243 | 4.4B SAR (≈$1.2B) | 69 | 59 | |
| 243 | 6.4B CNY (≈$900M) | 69 | 49 | |
| 243 | 267.8B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 69 | 68 | |
| 243 | 1.8B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 243 | 1.7B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 243 | 28.8B NOK (≈$2.7B) | 69 | ||
| 251 | 22.5B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 68 | 67 | |
| 251 | 11.1B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 68 | 46 | |
| 251 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 68 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score