Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Smithfield Foods, Inc.
How Smithfield Foods, Inc. stacks up
SFD · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #83 of 148 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 16.4% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SFD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 4.2% | 4.1% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 16.4% | 4.5% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | -1.4% | 3.5% | 23% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SFD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 79 | 2.1B USD | 51 | 42 | |
| 80 | 7.6B USD | 49 | 43 | |
| 81 | 3.0B USD | 48 | 63 | |
| 81 | 35.5B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 83 | 7.2B USD | 46 | 72 | |
| 83 | 1.8B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 85 | 37.1B USD | 45 | 48 | |
| 85 | 376.4B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 85 | 2.9B USD | 45 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score