Ranked #117 of 199 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
16 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including SF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 78% of peers. Book yield: 54.2% vs peer median 79.5%
●Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 8.3% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
SF
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 201 reported
8.1%
7.9%
55%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 61 reported
Not reported
8.9%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 105 reported
3.5%
9.7%
20%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 196 reported
51.2%
74.6%
31%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
