Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SERV · against 465 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #81 of 466 · scores higher than 83% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)54 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including SERV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SERV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 440 reported | 0.03× | 0.38× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 450 reported | 2.38 | 0.54 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 457 reported | 12.83× | 1.73× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 2 | 209M USD | 100 | 46 | |
| 4 | 402M USD | 100 | 39 | |
| 5 | 167.7B KRW (≈$121M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 77 | 51.9B JPY (≈$353M) | 89 | 80 | |
| 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) |
| 89 |
| 28 |
| 79 | 41.3B JPY (≈$281M) | 89 | 70 |
| 80 | 61.5B JPY (≈$419M) | 89 | 78 |
| 81 | 226M USD | 89 | 49 |
| 82 | 49.5B JPY (≈$337M) | 88 | 56 |
| 83 | 58.0B JPY (≈$395M) | 88 | 64 |
| 84 | 235M USD | 88 | 43 |
| 85 | 9.6B TWD (≈$297M) | 88 | 84 |