Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SEPN · against 404 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #78 of 405 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 83
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)43 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including SEPN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SEPN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 384 reported | 0.06× | 0.22× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 381 reported | Not reported | 0.58 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 390 reported | 5.00× | 2.90× | 70% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 74 | 12.0B SEK (≈$1.2B) | 85 | 72 | |
| 75 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 84 | 32 | |
| 76 | 2.29T KRW (≈$1.6B) | 84 | 88 | |
| 77 | 3.1B USD | 84 | 27 | |
| 78 | 2.0B USD | 83 | 53 | |
| 79 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 83 | 77 | |
| 80 | 21.6B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 83 | 70 | |
| 81 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 82 | 67 | |
| 82 | 22.8B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 82 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score