Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Septerna, Inc.
How Septerna, Inc. stacks up
SEPN · against 364 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #17 of 365 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score42 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including SEPN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 100% of peers. Revenue growth: 13520.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SEPN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SEPN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 367 reported | 13520.1% | 6.9% | 99% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 204 reported | Not reported | 9.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 357 reported | Not reported | 8.2% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SEPN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 17 | 1.9B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 17 | 3.0B USD | 95 | 54 | |
| 17 | 1.1B USD | 95 | 50 | |
| 17 | 1.6B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 17 | 2.0B USD | 95 | 53 | |
| 17 | 1.3B USD | 95 | 33 | |
| 23 | 1.6B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 23 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 32 | |
| 23 | 1.7B USD | 94 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score