Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SENS · against 449 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #251 of 450 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)38 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SENS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SENS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 417 reported | 0.70× | 0.17× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 432 reported | 1.08 | 0.44 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 443 reported | 6.75× | 2.89× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 3 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2.7B CNY (≈$375M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 247 | 5.9B CNY (≈$832M) | 52 | 26 | |
| 248 | 1.3B BRL (≈$238M) | 51 | 77 | |
| 249 | 14.41T IDR (≈$893M) | 51 | 69 | |
| 250 | 798.5B KRW (≈$575M) | 51 | 54 | |
| 251 | 468M USD | 50 | 40 | |
| 252 | 14.3B TRY (≈$428M) | 50 | 60 | |
| 253 | 528M USD | 49 | 58 | |
| 254 | 363.6B KRW (≈$262M) | 49 | 55 | |
| 255 | 5.2B CNY (≈$725M) | 49 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score