Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
How Senseonics Holdings, Inc. stacks up
SENS · against 438 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #395 of 439 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score45 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including SENS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -61.9% vs peer median 1.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: -84.4% vs peer median 4.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 90% of peers. Operating margin: -223.2% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SENS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SENS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 408 reported | -84.4% | 1.8% | 8% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 410 reported | -223.2% | 4.4% | 10% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 435 reported | -61.9% | 0.9% | 6% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 414 reported | -118.2% | 0.8% | 6% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 456 reported | 54.9% | 39.8% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SENS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 914M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 395 | 399M USD | 9 | 32 | |
| 395 | 455M USD | 9 | 36 | |
| 395 | 3.9B SEK (≈$385M) | 9 | 23 | |
| 395 | 730M USD | 9 | 11 | |
| 395 | 468M USD | 9 | 40 | |
| 401 | 243M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 401 | 357M USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 401 | 264M USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 401 | 332M USD | 8 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score