Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SENS · against 557 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #459 of 558 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score100 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including SENS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | SENS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 517 reported | -84.4% | -7.0% | 16% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 479 reported | -223.2% | -2.4% | 19% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 582 reported | -61.9% | -7.8% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 531 reported | -118.2% | -19.7% | 11% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 601 reported | 54.9% | 43.9% | 59% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 622M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 441M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 18.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 623M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 4.2B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 459 | 418M USD | 9 | 32 | |
| 459 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 447M USD |
| 9 |
| 36 |
| 459 | 984M USD | 9 | 35 |
| 459 | 766M USD | 9 | 11 |
| 459 | 477M USD | 9 | 40 |
| 459 | 3.5B USD | 9 | 39 |
| 469 | 241M USD | 8 | 27 |
| 469 | 2.3B USD | 8 | 6 |
| 469 | 364M USD | 8 | 32 |