Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
How Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. stacks up
SEI · against 105 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 106 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including SEI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 32.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 31.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 70.5% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SEI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 107 reported | 70.5% | 2.4% | 95% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 90 reported | 32.0% | 2.6% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 105 reported | 31.4% | 0.7% | 97% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SEI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 5.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 6 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 6 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.1B) | 96 | 69 | |
| 6 | 7.0B USD | 96 | 44 | |
| 9 | 7.5B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 10 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 11 | 5.1B USD | 91 | 55 | |
| 12 | 5.0B USD | 90 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score