Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
How Smith Douglas Homes Corp. stacks up
SDHC · against 175 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 176 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including SDHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 34.5% vs peer median 5.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 39.6% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SDHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SDHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 7.1% | 2.9% | 84% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 9.8% | 6.1% | 93% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 167 reported | 39.5% | 5.9% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 92.9% | 63.5% | 67% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SDHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | Unavailable | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 86M USD | 98 | 78 | |
| 4 | 255M USD | 96 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 6 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 6 | 946M USD | 93 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score