Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SandRidge Energy, Inc.
How SandRidge Energy, Inc. stacks up
SD · against 78 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
67/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #18 of 79 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including SD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -4.0% vs peer median -1.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.7% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: 23.2% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 23.2% | -1.5% | 84% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 45 reported | 8.7% | -2.6% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 78 reported | -4.0% | -1.5% | 42% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 3 | 900M USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 4 | 412M USD | 93 | 42 | |
| 14 | 755M USD | 71 | 41 | |
| 16 | 1.4B CAD (≈$986M) | 70 | 67 | |
| 17 | 670.8B KRW (≈$483M) | 68 | 69 | |
| 18 | 548M GBP (≈$712M) | 67 | 60 | |
| 18 | 496M USD | 67 | 85 | |
| 20 | 580M CAD (≈$424M) | 66 | 47 | |
| 21 | 3.3B HKD (≈$427M) | 64 | 30 | |
| 22 | 3.1B CNY (≈$437M) | 63 | 66 | |
| 22 | 428M USD | 63 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score