Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ScanSource, Inc.
How ScanSource, Inc. stacks up
SCSC · against 570 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #351 of 571 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score70 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including SCSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 19.8% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SCSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SCSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 576 reported | 6.1% | 7.7% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 356 reported | 19.8% | 6.2% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 568 reported | -5.2% | 4.4% | 23% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SCSC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 39.3B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 267.8B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 351 | 5.0B CNY (≈$705M) | 36 | 25 | |
| 351 | 100.7B JPY (≈$684M) | 36 | 61 | |
| 351 | 662M USD | 36 | 57 | |
| 351 | 1.8B USD | 36 | 24 | |
| 351 | 1.1B USD | 36 | 54 | |
| 361 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 35 | 44 | |
| 361 | 8.3B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 35 | 31 | |
| 363 | 5.0B CNY (≈$696M) | 34 | 40 | |
| 363 | 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) | 34 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score