Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ScanSource, Inc.
How ScanSource, Inc. stacks up
SCSC · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
36/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #382 of 479 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score43 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including SCSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 19.8% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SCSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SCSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 6.1% | 13.1% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 19.8% | 22.4% | 49% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | -5.2% | 9.7% | 12% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SCSC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 382 | 662M USD | 36 | 57 | |
| 382 | 1.8B USD | 36 | 24 | |
| 382 | 330M USD | 36 | 33 | |
| 382 | 9.9B USD | 36 | 56 | |
| 382 | 1.1B USD | 36 | 54 | |
| 387 | 7.6B USD | 35 | 55 | |
| 387 | 376M USD | 35 | 48 | |
| 387 | 39M USD | 35 | 12 | |
| 390 | 5.9B USD | 34 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score