Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Southern Copper Corporation
How Southern Copper Corporation stacks up
SCCO · against 11 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
86/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #4 of 12 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including SCCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 86?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 77% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 56.8% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 16.2% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 89% of peers. Revenue growth: 32.8% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SCCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SCCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 12 reported | 32.8% | 9.8% | 91% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 12 reported | 56.8% | 26.9% | 73% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 12 reported | 16.2% | 4.7% | 82% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SCCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84.6B USD | 95 | 82 | |
| 2 | 88.7B USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 3 | 113.2B USD | 88 | 86 | |
| 4 | 149.9B USD | 86 | 76 | |
| 5 | 725.9B HKD (≈$92.9B) | 78 | 71 | |
| 6 | 1.75T MXN (≈$94.4B) | 73 | 79 | |
| 7 | 198.6B USD | 63 | 70 | |
| 8 | 85.4B USD | 57 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score