Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Safe Bulkers, Inc.
How Safe Bulkers, Inc. stacks up
SB · against 939 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #302 of 940 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score88 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including SB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 83% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 941 reported | 10.3% | 3.8% | 90% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 951 reported | 14.4% | 7.1% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 205 reported | 7.2% | 3.5% | 66% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 944 reported | 114.9% | 55.0% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 302 | 19.4B TWD (≈$600M) | 69 | 68 | |
| 302 | 570M USD | 69 | 44 | |
| 302 | 613M EUR (≈$674M) | 69 | 60 | |
| 302 | 642M SGD (≈$488M) | 69 | 43 | |
| 302 | 847M USD | 69 | 56 | |
| 313 | 17.4B TWD (≈$540M) | 68 | 55 | |
| 313 | 3.8B CNY (≈$536M) | 68 | 66 | |
| 313 | 20.6B TWD (≈$639M) | 68 | 75 | |
| 313 | 11.1B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 68 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score