Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sanmina Corporation
How Sanmina Corporation stacks up
SANM · against 248 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
71/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #54 of 249 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score29 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including SANM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SANM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SANM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 247 reported | 3.4% | 2.7% | 62% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 251 reported | 9.0% | 4.4% | 85% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | 6.7% | 3.2% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 245 reported | 29.0% | 21.5% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SANM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 2 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 3 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 3 | 66.7B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 3 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 64 | |
| 52 | 328.8B TWD (≈$10.2B) | 72 | 37 | |
| 54 | 76.3B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 71 | 60 | |
| 54 | 59.9B CNY (≈$8.4B) | 71 | 78 | |
| 54 | 15.6B USD | 71 | 63 | |
| 54 | 8.8B USD | 71 | 57 | |
| 58 | 45.9B CNY (≈$6.4B) | 70 | 73 | |
| 58 | 142.8B TWD (≈$4.4B) | 70 | 34 | |
| 58 | 152.5B TWD (≈$4.7B) | 70 | 41 | |
| 58 | 6.2B USD | 70 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score