Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sanmina Corporation
How Sanmina Corporation stacks up
SANM · against 250 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #164 of 251 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score31 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including SANM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 4.2% vs peer median 6.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 69% of peers. Return on invested capital: 13.6% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SANM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SANM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 237 reported | 13.6% | 11.4% | 58% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 249 reported | 4.2% | 10.1% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 245 reported | 3.2% | 4.9% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 238 reported | 12.5% | 12.5% | 50% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 252 reported | 9.0% | 42.5% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SANMScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score