Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sangoma Technologies Corporation
How Sangoma Technologies Corporation stacks up
SANG · against 162 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #83 of 163 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SANG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield and EBITDA yield than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -4.2% vs peer median 2.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 63% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 94% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.0% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SANG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SANG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 153 reported | -4.2% | 1.8% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 169 reported | 2.8% | 5.5% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | 13.0% | 1.7% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 155 reported | 165.5% | 54.1% | 89% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SANG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2.4B HKD (≈$301M) | 98 | 42 | |
| 3 | 35.6B JPY (≈$242M) | 98 | 92 | |
| 3 | 6.7B TWD (≈$208M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 79 | 7.4B TWD (≈$229M) | 60 | 54 | |
| 79 | 6.7B TWD (≈$207M) | 60 | 47 | |
| 82 | 258M USD | 57 | 54 | |
| 83 | 8.0B TWD (≈$248M) | 55 | 46 | |
| 83 | 151M USD | 55 | 33 | |
| 85 | 7.5B TWD (≈$234M) | 54 | 32 | |
| 86 | 1.7B CNY (≈$244M) | 53 | 45 | |
| 87 | 8.0B TWD (≈$248M) | 52 | 36 | |
| 88 | 1.3B HKD (≈$168M) | 50 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score