Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SANG · against 170 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #113 of 171 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score21 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including SANG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on invested capital, return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | SANG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 154 reported | -10.0% | 1.6% | 27% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 168 reported | -0.5% | 1.9% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 166 reported | -2.9% | 1.1% | 27% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 158 reported | -37.8% | 3.4% | 14% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 171 reported | 70.3% | 30.2% | 86% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 259M USD | 97 | 82 | |
| 3 | 12.9B JPY (≈$88M) | 96 | 75 | |
| 4 | 40.7B JPY (≈$277M) | 95 | 83 | |
| 4 | 136M EUR (≈$149M) | 95 | 73 | |
| 110 | 275M USD | 19 | 36 | |
| 110 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 172M USD |
| 19 |
| 33 |
| 113 | 6.9B TWD (≈$215M) | 18 | 49 |
| 113 | 163M NZD (≈$98M) | 18 | 39 |
| 113 | 151M USD | 18 | 33 |
| 116 | 2.1B CNY (≈$292M) | 17 | 13 |
| 116 | 1.5B CNY (≈$208M) | 17 | 33 |
| 116 | 300M AUD (≈$198M) | 17 | 23 |
| 119 | 274M USD | 16 | 27 |