Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SAIC · against 299 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #263 of 300 · scores higher than 12% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)34 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SAIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SAIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 290 reported | 1.88× | 0.31× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 283 reported | 0.30 | 1.01 | 93% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 298 reported | 1.20× | 1.81× | 19% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 259 | 11.9B USD | 14 | 50 | |
| 260 | 30.5B CNY (≈$4.3B) | 13 | 39 | |
| 261 | 65.8B CNY (≈$9.2B) | 13 | 46 | |
| 262 | 38.9B CNY (≈$5.4B) | 13 | 30 | |
| 263 | 6.4B USD | 13 | 47 | |
| 264 | 61.3B CNY (≈$8.6B) | 13 | 53 | |
| 265 | 24.4B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 12 | 14 | |
| 266 | 361.8B TWD (≈$11.2B) | 12 | 32 | |
| 267 | 5.4B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 12 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score