Ranked #66 of 260 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
24 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including SAFT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on assets, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 73% of peers. Return on equity: 7.8% vs peer median 10.7%
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 82% of peers. Return on assets: 2.7% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SAFT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
SAFT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 233 reported
16.0%
10.8%
73%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 38 reported
Not reported
18.5%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 261 reported
2.7%
1.1%
84%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 260 reported
7.8%
9.9%
36%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 272 reported
7.6%
0.0%
67%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
