Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sabre Corporation
How Sabre Corporation stacks up
SABR · against 602 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #111 of 603 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score71 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including SABR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 93% of peers. Earnings yield: 106.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.4% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.0% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SABR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SABR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 586 reported | -11.4% | 1.7% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 615 reported | 9.6% | 4.0% | 77% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 175 reported | -2.4% | 2.0% | 30% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 593 reported | -158.8% | 40.2% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SABR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 4 | 32.0B TWD (≈$990M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 111 | 1.0B USD | 83 | 75 | |
| 111 | 560M EUR (≈$616M) | 83 | 51 | |
| 111 | 964M EUR (≈$1.1B) | 83 | 49 | |
| 111 | 629M AUD (≈$415M) | 83 | 57 | |
| 111 | 674M USD | 83 | 61 | |
| 120 | 17.8B TWD (≈$553M) | 82 | 52 | |
| 120 | 20.3B TWD (≈$631M) | 82 | 51 | |
| 120 | 3.9B CNY (≈$542M) | 82 | 68 | |
| 120 | 56.3B JPY (≈$383M) | 82 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score