Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sabre Corporation
How Sabre Corporation stacks up
SABR · against 617 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
81/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #72 of 618 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score42 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including SABR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 81?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and operating margin, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 9.9% vs peer median 6.8%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 67% of peers. Operating margin: 11.3% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on assets: 16.4% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SABR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SABR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 580 reported | 9.9% | 3.9% | 70% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 612 reported | 11.3% | 4.3% | 78% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 604 reported | 16.4% | 1.5% | 98% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 595 reported | Not reported | 4.6% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 618 reported | 56.4% | 27.2% | 85% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SABR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 72.9B JPY (≈$496M) | 98 | 82 | |
| 69 | 13.6B TWD (≈$421M) | 82 | 72 | |
| 69 | 105.8B JPY (≈$720M) | 82 | 72 | |
| 72 | 1.55T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 81 | 68 | |
| 72 | 3.4B CNY (≈$482M) | 81 | 91 | |
| 72 | 674M USD | 81 | 61 | |
| 72 | 555M CAD (≈$405M) | 81 | 55 | |
| 76 | 28.2B TWD (≈$873M) | 80 | 59 | |
| 76 | 3.6B CNY (≈$502M) | 80 | 70 | |
| 76 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 80 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score