Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Revvity, Inc.
How Revvity, Inc. stacks up
RVTY · against 112 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #99 of 113 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including RVTY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -5.9% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RVTY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RVTY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 114 reported | 3.7% | 9.4% | 21% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 88 reported | -5.9% | 17.7% | 24% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 110 reported | -4.8% | 9.4% | 5% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RVTY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 2 | 14.87T KRW (≈$10.7B) | 97 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 4 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 14.5B USD | 96 | 30 | |
| 94 | 12.3B USD | 33 | 35 | |
| 94 | 166.5B SEK (≈$16.6B) | 33 | 49 | |
| 98 | 10.8B USD | 31 | 35 | |
| 99 | 16.9B USD | 29 | 37 | |
| 99 | 18.2B USD | 29 | 40 | |
| 101 | 154.4B BRL (≈$27.8B) | 28 | 43 | |
| 101 | 11.9B USD | 28 | 53 | |
| 103 | 36.0B USD | 27 | 46 | |
| 104 | 1.85T JPY (≈$12.5B) | 26 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score