Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RVLV · against 464 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #239 of 465 · scores higher than 49% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)54 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including RVLV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RVLV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 458 reported | 0.06× | 0.49× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 456 reported | 1.62 | 0.54 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 452 reported | 2.48× | 1.50× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) | 99 | 70 | |
| 4 | 6.7B HKD (≈$861M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 5 | 6.3B CNY (≈$882M) | 98 | 60 | |
| 235 | 122.2B JPY (≈$831M) | 51 | 54 | |
| 236 | 6.7B CNY (≈$943M) | 51 | 16 | |
| 237 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 51 | 36 | |
| 238 | 14.7B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 239 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 63 | |
| 240 | 135.1B JPY (≈$918M) | 50 | 53 | |
| 241 | 8.1B SAR (≈$2.2B) | 50 | 59 | |
| 242 | 8.5B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 50 | 48 | |
| 243 | 3.0B USD | 50 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score