Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Revolve Group, Inc.
How Revolve Group, Inc. stacks up
RVLV · against 472 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #61 of 473 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score56 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including RVLV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 6.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 87% of peers. Return on assets: 8.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: 27.5% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RVLV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RVLV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 448 reported | 27.5% | 8.6% | 93% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 473 reported | 6.1% | 7.4% | 39% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 448 reported | 8.6% | 3.7% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 438 reported | 14.3% | 9.4% | 72% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 475 reported | 54.3% | 31.4% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RVLV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 5 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 61 | 7.4B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 84 | 57 | |
| 61 | 3.8B SAR (≈$1.0B) | 84 | 57 | |
| 61 | 77.4B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 84 | 50 | |
| 61 | 2.4B USD | 84 | 81 | |
| 61 | 1.5B USD | 84 | 63 | |
| 66 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 83 | 66 | |
| 66 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 83 | 67 | |
| 66 | 5.5B CNY (≈$766M) | 83 | 50 | |
| 66 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 83 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score