Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RTX Corporation
How RTX Corporation stacks up
RTX · against 13 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
73/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #5 of 14 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including RTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 25.0% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RTX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 14 reported | 11.8% | 10.0% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 14 reported | 25.0% | 20.8% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 14 reported | 9.8% | 6.6% | 77% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RTX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 244.5B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 2 | 332.7B USD | 90 | 56 | |
| 3 | 1.85T BRL (≈$332.4B) | 85 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1.15T CNY (≈$161.5B) | 80 | 79 | |
| 5 | 274.7B USD | 73 | 55 | |
| 6 | 286.8B USD | 71 | 52 | |
| 7 | 147.5B USD | 70 | 54 | |
| 8 | 152.1B USD | 69 | 49 | |
| 9 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 62 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score