Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Reliance, Inc.
How Reliance, Inc. stacks up
RS · against 82 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #58 of 83 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including RS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.4% vs peer median 2.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 3.9% | 5.7% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 84 reported | 6.3% | 10.6% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 33 reported | 2.4% | 3.1% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 82 reported | 32.7% | 41.9% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 195.7B HKD (≈$25.0B) | 97 | 74 | |
| 2 | 263.2B HKD (≈$33.7B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 3 | 11.4B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 4 | 92.8B HKD (≈$11.9B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 94 | 88 | |
| 55 | 15.3B USD | 45 | 40 | |
| 55 | 30.3B USD | 45 | 59 | |
| 57 | 2.10T INR (≈$25.2B) | 44 | 50 | |
| 58 | 20.7B USD | 43 | 58 | |
| 58 | 22.7B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 60 | 1.12T INR (≈$13.5B) | 41 | 48 | |
| 60 | 15.0B USD | 41 | 24 | |
| 60 | 36.9B USD | 41 | 52 | |
| 63 | 43.6B USD | 39 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score