Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RRR · against 283 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #279 of 284 · scores higher than 2% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including RRR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RRR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 274 reported | 12.46× | 0.56× | 1% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 276 reported | 1.31 | 0.83 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 272 reported | 0.68× | 1.49× | 6% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 275 | 7.5B USD | 4 | 25 | |
| 276 | 6.1B USD | 3 | 53 | |
| 277 | 4.6B USD | 3 | 56 | |
| 278 | 62.0B DKK (≈$9.3B) | 3 | 55 | |
| 279 | 5.2B USD | 2 | 54 | |
| 280 | 7.7B USD | 2 | 42 | |
| 281 | 4.4B USD | 2 | 45 | |
| 282 | 2.9B USD | 2 | 60 | |
| 283 | 5.9B USD | 1 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score