Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RRC · against 64 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 65 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including RRC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RRC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 65 reported | 0.22× | 0.56× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 64 reported | 0.43 | 0.55 | 63% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 62 reported | 0.65× | 1.23× | 8% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 2 | 22.9B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 93 | 62 | |
| 4 | 7.5B USD | 81 | 79 | |
| 5 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 80 | 76 | |
| 24 | 6.8B USD | 60 | 70 | |
| 25 | 87.1B CNY (≈$12.2B) | 58 | 66 | |
| 26 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 58 | 39 | |
| 27 | 93.4B NOK (≈$8.9B) | 57 | 64 | |
| 28 | 12.6B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 29 | 83.8B CNY (≈$11.7B) | 54 | 52 | |
| 30 | 16.7B USD | 52 | 70 | |
| 31 | 20.1B USD | 51 | 65 | |
| 32 | 6.4B USD | 49 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score