Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Repay Holdings Corporation
How Repay Holdings Corporation stacks up
RPAY · against 553 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #269 of 554 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including RPAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -42.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -4.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 91% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 27.6% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RPAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RPAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 535 reported | -44.5% | 1.5% | 3% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 571 reported | 6.8% | 3.9% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 175 reported | 11.2% | 2.3% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 544 reported | 126.1% | 44.8% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RPAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 269 | 714M USD | 47 | 21 | |
| 269 | 608M USD | 47 | 22 | |
| 269 | 686M USD | 47 | 21 | |
| 269 | 1.7B BRL (≈$307M) | 47 | 52 | |
| 269 | 399M USD | 47 | 23 | |
| 276 | 1.8B CNY (≈$246M) | 46 | 61 | |
| 276 | 50.5B JPY (≈$343M) | 46 | 42 | |
| 278 | 3.6B CNY (≈$507M) | 45 | 39 | |
| 278 | 5.3B CNY (≈$739M) | 45 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score