Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Repay Holdings Corporation
How Repay Holdings Corporation stacks up
RPAY · against 575 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
4/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #539 of 576 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score75 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including RPAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 4?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 95% of peers. Operating margin: -44.2% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 95% of peers. Return on assets: -10.4% vs peer median 2.9%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 88% of peers. Return on invested capital: -10.3% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RPAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RPAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 531 reported | -10.3% | 2.9% | 17% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 570 reported | -44.2% | 3.4% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 563 reported | -10.4% | 1.2% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 550 reported | -31.8% | 3.3% | 7% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 576 reported | 73.5% | 26.8% | 93% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RPAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 50.3B JPY (≈$342M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1.1B MYR (≈$240M) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 60.1B JPY (≈$409M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 539 | 15.2B TWD (≈$472M) | 4 | 24 | |
| 539 | 9.3B TWD (≈$288M) | 4 | 18 | |
| 539 | 633M USD | 4 | 1 | |
| 539 | 4.0B NOK (≈$376M) | 4 | 52 | |
| 539 | 399M USD | 4 | 23 | |
| 539 | 176M GBP (≈$228M) | 4 | 19 | |
| 546 | 1.9B CNY (≈$263M) | 3 | 16 | |
| 546 | 1.7B CNY (≈$245M) | 3 | 28 | |
| 546 | 3.3B CNY (≈$466M) | 3 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score