Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
How Ranger Energy Services, Inc. stacks up
RNGR · against 63 other Energy companies of similar size
Profitability
28/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #34 of 64 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score14 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including RNGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 76% of peers. Operating margin: 3.7% vs peer median 11.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 66% of peers. Return on invested capital: 6.0% vs peer median 9.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 3.1% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 61 reported | 6.0% | 6.5% | 48% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 62 reported | 3.7% | 7.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 64 reported | 3.1% | 1.5% | 63% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 60 reported | 4.9% | 3.7% | 58% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 64 reported | 17.7% | 32.1% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNGR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 94 | 60 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 94 | 88 | |
| 4 | 496M USD | 90 | 85 | |
| 5 | 670.8B KRW (≈$483M) | 88 | 69 | |
| 30 | 76.6B JPY (≈$521M) | 29 | 52 | |
| 30 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 29 | 47 | |
| 30 | 580M CAD (≈$424M) | 29 | 47 | |
| 30 | 412M USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 34 | 328M USD | 28 | 54 | |
| 35 | 261M USD | 27 | 56 | |
| 36 | 3.3B HKD (≈$427M) | 25 | 30 | |
| 37 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 23 | 48 | |
| 37 | 392M USD | 23 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score