Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
How Ranger Energy Services, Inc. stacks up
RNGR · against 55 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #32 of 56 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including RNGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 77% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -39.7% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -2.4% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.1% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 60 reported | 6.1% | -1.5% | 66% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 31 reported | -39.7% | -1.2% | 23% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 56 reported | -2.4% | -1.4% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNGR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.9B CNY (≈$413M) | 93 | 49 | |
| 3 | 412M USD | 93 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2.5B CNY (≈$343M) | 92 | 28 | |
| 27 | 448M USD | 41 | 42 | |
| 29 | 651M USD | 40 | 39 | |
| 30 | 392M USD | 39 | 21 | |
| 31 | 363M USD | 37 | 37 | |
| 32 | 328M USD | 36 | 54 | |
| 33 | 1.9B CNY (≈$272M) | 34 | 35 | |
| 34 | 2.2B CNY (≈$314M) | 31 | 26 | |
| 35 | 199M USD | 30 | 57 | |
| 36 | 4.2B CNY (≈$595M) | 29 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score