Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RingCentral, Inc.
How RingCentral, Inc. stacks up
RNG · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #323 of 479 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including RNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.1% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 4.8% | 13.1% | 24% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | Not reported | 22.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 8.1% | 9.7% | 46% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 318 | 18.8B USD | 50 | 64 | |
| 318 | 20.2B USD | 50 | 50 | |
| 318 | 6.8B USD | 50 | 52 | |
| 323 | 5.7B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 323 | 6.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 325 | 117.3B USD | 48 | 56 | |
| 325 | 1.3B USD | 48 | 40 | |
| 325 | 2.5B USD | 48 | 58 | |
| 325 | 6.7B USD | 48 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score