Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RMNI · against 604 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #589 of 605 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)56 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including RMNI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RMNI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 571 reported | Not reported | 0.21× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 586 reported | 1.24 | 0.67 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 604 reported | 0.84× | 1.92× | 6% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 4 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 99 | 52 | |
| 585 | 33.0B INR (≈$396M) | 3 | 51 | |
| 586 | 1.06T KRW (≈$766M) | 3 | 55 | |
| 587 | 742M USD | 3 | 61 | |
| 588 | 772M USD | 3 | 21 | |
| 589 | 457M USD | 3 | 47 | |
| 590 | 662M USD | 2 | 57 | |
| 591 | 12.8B TWD (≈$395M) | 2 | 8 | |
| 592 | 667.7B KRW (≈$481M) | 2 | 52 | |
| 593 | 475M USD | 2 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score