Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RMD · against 83 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #22 of 84 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including RMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | RMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | 4.6% | 2.9% | 84% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 6.5% | 5.3% | 64% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 56 reported | 5.0% | 3.8% | 75% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | 20.1% | 20.1% | 49% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.5B USD | 95 | 60 | |
| 2 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2.57T JPY (≈$17.5B) | 88 | 62 | |
| 4 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 86 | 70 | |
| 5 | 45.9B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 17 | 25.8B USD | 70 | 75 | |
| 19 | 154.4B BRL (≈$27.8B) | 69 | 43 | |
| 19 | 101.7B BRL (≈$18.3B) | 69 | 58 | |
| 19 | 52.7B EUR (≈$58.0B) | 69 | 71 | |
| 22 | 32.8B USD | 68 | 69 | |
| 23 | 17.9B USD | 67 | 76 | |
| 23 | 133.4B BRL (≈$24.0B) | 67 | 49 | |
| 25 | 27.3B USD | 66 | 55 | |
| 26 | 177.2B HKD (≈$22.7B) | 65 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score