Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ResMed Inc.
How ResMed Inc. stacks up
RMD · against 80 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #45 of 81 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.3% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.2% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RMD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 9.9% | 10.2% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 61 reported | 10.3% | 14.8% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 80 reported | 10.2% | 9.8% | 51% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RMD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 2 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 4 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 39 | 22.6B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 42 | 28.7B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 42 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 42 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 55 | 70 | |
| 45 | 32.8B USD | 54 | 69 | |
| 45 | 28.6B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 47 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 53 | 70 | |
| 47 | 21.5B USD | 53 | 60 | |
| 47 | 25.8B USD | 53 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score