Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rambus Inc.
How Rambus Inc. stacks up
RMBS · against 248 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #144 of 249 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score30 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including RMBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RMBS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RMBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 247 reported | 2.5% | 2.7% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 251 reported | 3.8% | 4.5% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 137 reported | 3.1% | 3.2% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 244 reported | 15.3% | 21.3% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RMBS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 2 | 6.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 3 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 3 | 66.7B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 3 | 6.5B USD | 94 | 64 | |
| 139 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 48 | 82 | |
| 139 | 913.1B INR (≈$11.0B) | 48 | 69 | |
| 139 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 144 | 757.8B JPY (≈$5.2B) | 47 | 67 | |
| 144 | 9.6B USD | 47 | 75 | |
| 144 | 15.3B USD | 47 | 37 | |
| 147 | 155.5B TWD (≈$4.8B) | 46 | 33 | |
| 148 | 498.3B TWD (≈$15.4B) | 45 | 70 | |
| 148 | 51.2B CNY (≈$7.2B) | 45 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score