Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RLJ Lodging Trust
How RLJ Lodging Trust stacks up
RLJ-PA · against 730 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
28/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #523 of 731 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including RLJ-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -52.6% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.1% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RLJ-PA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RLJ-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 1.1% | 3.0% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | -52.6% | 11.1% | 9% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 2.3% | 3.8% | 43% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RLJ-PA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 523 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 28 | 38 | |
| 523 | 4.2B USD | 28 | 18 | |
| 523 | 1.5B USD | 28 | 72 | |
| 523 | 6.0B EUR (≈$6.6B) | 28 | 32 | |
| 523 | Unavailable | 28 | 33 | |
| 523 | 1.2B GBP (≈$1.6B) | 28 | 43 | |
| 523 | 2.1B USD | 28 | 32 | |
| 531 | 11.9B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 27 | 38 | |
| 531 | 374M SGD (≈$284M) | 27 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score