Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Radiant Logistics, Inc.
How Radiant Logistics, Inc. stacks up
RLGT · against 876 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #502 of 877 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score79 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including RLGT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 82% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.2% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RLGT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RLGT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 884 reported | 3.5% | 2.3% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 561 reported | 9.2% | 4.1% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 874 reported | -4.9% | 2.7% | 23% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RLGT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 6.6B NOK (≈$625M) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 518M EUR (≈$570M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 5 | 1.9B CNY (≈$268M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 502 | 3.9B CNY (≈$549M) | 34 | 53 | |
| 502 | 76.1B JPY (≈$518M) | 34 | 70 | |
| 502 | 7.0B SEK (≈$699M) | 34 | 42 | |
| 502 | 613M USD | 34 | ||
| 502 | 441M USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 502 | 19.1B INR (≈$229M) | 34 | 56 | |
| 510 | 3.9B CNY (≈$547M) | 33 | 19 | |
| 510 | 3.3B CNY (≈$459M) | 33 | 28 | |
| 510 | 66.8B JPY (≈$454M) | 33 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score