Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RL · against 107 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #59 of 108 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 40
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including RL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 1.10× | 0.71× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 109 reported | 1.35 | 0.81 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 103 reported | 2.04× | 1.42× | 72% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 3 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 4 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 5 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 93 | 82 | |
| 55 | 12.2B USD | 42 | 63 | |
| 56 | 44.1B USD | 42 | 35 | |
| 57 | 42.1B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 58 | 13.5B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 59 | 23.5B USD | 40 | 62 | |
| 60 | 13.9B USD | 37 | 44 | |
| 61 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 35 | 53 | |
| 62 | 18.0B USD | 35 | 56 | |
| 63 | 22.8B USD | 34 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score