Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Raymond James Financial, Inc.
How Raymond James Financial, Inc. stacks up
RJF · against 161 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 162 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score17 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including RJF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.4% vs peer median 2.6%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 95% of peers. Return on invested capital: 84.2% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RJF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RJF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 157 reported | 84.2% | 7.1% | 97% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 84 reported | Not reported | 23.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 183 reported | 2.4% | 2.6% | 46% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 176 reported | 18.4% | 10.4% | 69% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 200 reported | 93.2% | 83.0% | 53% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RJF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 566.9B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2.7B USD | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 31.1B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 4 | 4.2B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2.7B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 6 | 141.3B USD | 95 | 52 | |
| 6 | 46.5B USD | 95 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score